![]() His artistry lies in making all those extensive inputs appear so deceptively slice of one’s life. Alphonse’s film is a master class in feel good writing, the manner in which he seamlessly combines 3 stages in one’s life with romance while noticing the minute but colourful details that add zing to love stories and feel good narrative. Moreover, its exaggerated tone resonates with commercial sensibilities.Ĭhandoo has no excuse. Recently, Anil Kumar came out with Run, another remake of Alphonse’s film Neram, where the source is unapologetically prosy and so it’s hard surprising if its reproduction is even tawdrier. So while film makers have no scruples about riving or remaking verified commercial hits, they cannot resist this urge to improvise or show their true caliber in the process. Praveen, Harsha, Noel, Srinivas Reddy and Chaitanya Krishna have nothing much to do playing Vikram’s friends.Īs a popular film critic once said, “What’s the point of a Telugu remake? Firstly a director wants to recreate the success of the original or Wants to better it so that it gets the due it never did or because he wants to remind the audience its forgotten virtues.īut after watching Chandoo Mondeti’s remake of Alphonse’s 2015 genX classic, I have to come up with a few more alternatives, which certainly apply to Premam Telugu remake – Tollywood is lazy, out of ideas and over cocky. Bhramaji once again delivers a polished but a routine performance of a PT Master and Prudhvi could have been used in a better way. Plus it was also much painful to watch a renowned actor Nagarjuna acting in such visionless venture seriously. Attarintiki Daredi fame Narra Srinu as Mava was a terrible choice for the character. Being a dancer herself, she seemed to develop two left feet for the song. Even in the song Hey Machi the Rcokaankuthu feel went missing. Here the same kind of Innocence or Rawness was missing even though Shruti by now should have been a seasoned campaigner, she neither has a competent acting skills nor she tries to improve. Sai Pallavi was an iconic in her debut because she was able to bring the rawness and innocence to a true believer character like Malar. The ladies didn’t have much to do other than to look pretty and smile, best being Anupama Parmeswaran. He showcased why he is more capable of delivering a three dimensional performance, even if the demands of the script seem to force his performance to something slightly hammy towards the end. Naga Chaitanya Akkineni did a fine job with his controlled acting. The beauty of the film lies with its premam-ful soul, everyone can relate with atleast one of the three love stories (Innocent love with Mary, the Silent one with Malar & Matured one with Celine). The film follows three stages of love life George (as a boy, man & gentleman). Similar to 2015 Original, The film is all about the life of a person who’s been through three stages of love (like three stages of butterfly, birth-pupa stage & butterfly). Let’s check out the review for more details. Still, we can’t resist shaking our fist in protest everytime we read that Premam is getting remade, or that Shruti Haasan is playing Sai Pallavi’s role in the new remake. And yet, Tollywood seems hell bent on churning out one movie remake after another. No writer would try to take another stab at Gundammakatha (1963). Music Composed byGopi Sunder & Rajesh MurugesanĬensor Certificate: UA & Runtime: 158 MinutesĪ true artist would never look at Vendatam Raghavayya’s Devdas (1953) and think, you know what? I think I can improve on that. Cast: Naga Chaitanya Akkineni, Shruti Haasan, Anupama Parameswaran, Madonna Sebastian, Harsha, Daggubati Venkatesh, Nagarjuna, Srinivasa Reddy, Prudhvi Raj and Avantika Vandanapu.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |